🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a pending law that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The company operates its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.