I'm a Committed Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Represents the Best Solution for US Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.

Matthew Smith
Matthew Smith

A seasoned casino enthusiast with over a decade of experience in slot machine analysis and gaming strategy development.